Worsening Over Time: The Progression of Bipolar Disorder

In some people, bipolar disorder gets worse over time. Not everyone. And treatment is supposed to prevent this, at least in the best of cases.
The graph above shows one hypothetical patient's experience, where depression is shown as a bar below the line, a manic episode as a bar above the line, and hospitalizations in red. The height of the bar indicates the severity of the episode. Fortunately, few cases are as bad as this, but the pattern is obvious -- and that pattern is very common.
In Bipolar I, where episodes tend to be separated by "well intervals", one can see a progression like the one shown above: episodes become more severe, and the length of time in between episodes become shorter. In Bipolar II, more continuous symptoms are common. In this case, illness progression is characterized by an increasing severity of mood swings, and sometimes more rapid cycling. In many people, manic and depression symptoms occur at the same time, and what is called a "mixed state". In other words, the pattern shown in the graph above is not easily seen in people who have more complex and mixed symptoms. Yet the progression toward more severe symptoms over time is still going on.
Unfortunately, this also means that sometimes a treatment which worked at one point is no longer sufficient to provide complete symptom control later. Sometimes a person who symptoms were quite well-controlled on one medication ends up on three a few years later.
What causes this progression? This is not well understood, in part because we do not know what causes the illness itself; we do not know what the molecular and genetic basis of bipolar disorder is (although we know a lot more than we did 10 years ago, as outlined on my webpage about "what causes bipolar disorder?"). However, we do know some of the factors which seem to influence whether people experience this can progression or not, and how fast.
Basically, mood specialists currently presume that anything which has a "destabilizing influence" is likely to be one of the causes of progression. You can imagine how hard it is to do research on this: people continue to live their lives, and thus expose themselves to all sorts of influences. How could you tell whether the influence you are studying was truly the "cause" of worsening? There are always too many variables to really know.
For now, we are extrapolating from our experience with the obvious triggers. Probably the biggest one is substance use. Methamphetamine and cocaine might be the worst. Alcohol comes along shortly after that: even though in the short run it can damp down symptoms, in the long run it tends to cause more cycling in most people. Pain medications are not as bad, and it seems, at least in our current understanding. They can cause trouble in some people but nowhere near as often as street stimulants and alcohol.
What about marijuana? Evidence has accumulated that this can lead to psychotic episodes in susceptible individuals. In Bipolar I, therefore, it might be best avoided entirely. At the same time, many patients who see me in our local free clinic have been using marijuana for years, just a puff or two at night, because they have found that it helps them sleep. They are quite certain they would be worse without it, although they tend to give it up if they get a very good response to a mood stabilizer medication (in which case I can claim"my drugs are better than your drugs").
The other big destabilizing influence is sleep deprivation. People who take on erratic schedules, such as shift work, often see a dramatic worsening in mood stability. Even just a plane flight across time zones can be a major trigger in some susceptible individuals. Evidence is accumulating that careful attention to sleep schedule, and even light exposure, is very important in self-management of bipolar disorder. See my essay on Light and Darkness in Bipolar Disorder for some interesting data about the role of darkness independent of sleep.
Finally,without necessarily having exhausted this list, a word about antidepressants. One of my greatest fears about current psychiatric practice is that 10 years or more from now we might discover that widespread use of antidepressants has led to an acceleration in bipolar progression in people receiving these medications, in those who were later discovered to have bipolar disorder (let alone those who were known at the time to have bipolar disorder). This acceleration has been called "kindling", after a similar phenomenon seen in epilepsy. I sure hope that I'm wrong about this. Until we have a good biological marker of Bipolar Disorder which can show us where a person is on this illness progression, so that we might be able to see -- literally -- progression associated with antidepressants, this kindling worry is likely to remain just that, a background worry, not a known problem. See more about this on my page about Antidepressant Controversies, the section on kindling.
(This entry was composed in response to a reader's request for information on this topic. Thank you for the inquiry)Dr. Phelps





9 Comments:
Thanks for the post. You mention the concern you have re: treating BP patients with SSRI's, largely as a result of misdiagnosis (I believe the figure is ~ 10 yrs from diag of uni dep to correct diag of BP for most people). That seems like a long time to be taking a psychotropic med, the real long-term effects of which seem to be greatly unknown. Since first reading this disc on psyched, has there been any further research into this? It is still astouning to me that so many psychiatrists seem to not know that treating someone with (undiagnosed) BP, in a severe depression, can cause a 'tipping' into mania. Is this mania 'triggering' considered to be diagnostic by clinicians, in pinning-down BP vs unipolar depression? Do you think psychiatrists are more aware of this danger now than ~ 10 years back?
Also, is there a 'site map' for psycheducation.org, where one might more easily find past articles? I remember that most of your essays were heavily-linked, making for a kind of research adventure, but making it a bit tough to find something specific later on. If there is no such directory of direct links, this would be a great addition to the site.
Thanks very much.
Thanks for the comment. I will try to address the first half in a new blog post.
As for the site map, you're right, with the link pattern it can be hard to find things. Try the search engine, which is just googled but on my site specifically. I use that myself sometimes. The length that is in the upper for that -hand corner of the home page, "search this site".
Whoops, that search link: "upper right hand corner".
JP
Heh. I sort of wish I hadn't read this. I hope I'm not on a decline. Thinking type things have gotten harder over time...I keep telling myself that's just age.
The light-dark and plane thing sure are true though. Thanks for the site and the info.
I went through the gamut prior to arriving at "rapid cycling"..ADD, unipolar depression, "this will pass" and their requisite meds. This went on for years. Had suicidal thoughts but no hard plans. I now take seroquel and lamictal with great results. As to the "worsening" with time I do notice the severity of the swings is sometimes worse. I also seem to be able to detect the changes almost like a "switch goinf on and off".....
I have just learnt something new and I'm thinking,I might have suffered from other disorders that I didn't know were disorders.
..............................
Laura Green
Dual Diagnosis
dual-diagnosis.net
what are your thoughts on lamicatal to treat bi polar 2?
I asked you this question before, but spelled it incorrectly.
It is great. The main problem in bipolar II is depression, and cycling (which produces the less frequent and usually less damaging hypomania). Lamotrigine is quite effective against both of these, and lacks the long-term risks of nearly all other medication options. It has a short-term risk, 6-8 weeks, of a severe skin rash which is not to be taken lightly. But beyond that, it beats the rest of the options, in terms of overall risk, by a long shot.
There are important non-medication approaches which need to be optimized, but few people who have reached my office can manage their symptoms with those interventions alone (avoiding alcohol, maintaining a regular schedule, especially sleep, getting regular exercise, and avoiding major emotional stresses [like who can do that last one reliably?])
Dr. Phelps
Just lost my Bf of the past 10 years to AD rapid cycling. He is a surgeon who became addicted/dependent on Wellbutrin and cant get off of it.
It made him Manic from day 1 and its been pretty unremitting. Worst is he has zero insight into the nature of his problems which ofcourse he know blames on me. Guess there wasnt anyone else left to blame
Post a Comment
<< Home