<body><iframe src="http://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID=26990864&amp;blogName=PsychEducation+-+The+Blog&amp;publishMode=PUBLISH_MODE_FTP&amp;navbarType=BLUE&amp;layoutType=CLASSIC&amp;homepageUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.psycheducation.com%2F&amp;searchRoot=http%3A%2F%2Fblogsearch.google.com%2F" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" height="30px" width="100%" id="navbar-iframe" title="Blogger Navigation and Search"></iframe> <div id="space-for-ie"></div>
Dr. Jim Phelps
In addition to my practice of Psychiatry, I write PsychEducation.org, a non-profit website which presents, in 10th-grade English, 300 pages of information and references on complex topics in mental illness -- bipolar disorders, brain chemistry, important brain parts, and more. This Blog presents changes on the website; important new research results; and "What I Learned Today" -- from my patients. The website is free, but the book version below is an easier read...

Saturday, October 20, 2007

Why Does It Take so Long?

You may know the story about lithium. It was discovered from a mistaken focus on urate. Until today, however, I did not realize that the first use of lithium was not in 1948 by Dr. John Cage in Australia -- but rather, nearly a century before, in 1871. (Here is a very brief little history of lithium).

Why does it take so long for an effective treatment to be recognized?

Certainly it helps if there is a pharmaceutical company spending millions of dollars on advertising. A medication like olanzapine (Zyprexa), for example, sprung into widespread use within a few years after its release -- in part because one only needs to prescribe it a few times before recognizing that it has remarkable effectiveness. (Unfortunately, one only has to prescribe it a few times more than that before discovering that it has remarkable weight gain effects as well).

Recently I have become interested in two treatment approaches for bipolar disorder which, lacking pharmaceutical company advertising, could easily go several decades relatively unnoticed. Neither of them is clearly established as an effective treatment yet, in part because there is no pharmaceutical company funding research.

First, we have the new data arriving about use of thyroid hormone as a mood stabilizer. This is a very unusual approach relative to the standard recommendations. Learn more on my webpage posted today about high-dose thyroid hormone.

Second, regular readers here will probably have come across my enthusiasm for darkness as a potential mood stabilizer. This too has very limited data supporting its use, but it is cheap and widely available and unlikely to be harmful and therefore worth knowing about. See my webpages on Dark Therapy, and the related big-picture view of this approach, Light and Darkness In Bipolar Disorder.

Maybe in this age of aggressive patient self-education, and widespread Internet access, it will not take so long for a treatment -- even one without $millions in advertising -- to become widely known.

Dr. Phelps

Labels:

Email this post | save in Del.icio.us

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dr. P:
I posed this question before, perhaps not too clearly. There are many meds (SSRI's for ex) that can be tapered to smaller doses over time. This seems to indicate that there are protective ('prophilactic') benefits to doing this, while minimizing the drug's side effects. I've read much about the potential toxicity of lithium (at 'therapeutic' levels), and other unpleasant side effects.
Yet time and again, Li comes up as the only agent with a very high effectiveness against recurrance of mania. Has there been any study into whether lower doses (well-below toxicity potential) of Li have any long-term benefits re: treating/preventing depression in 'BP II' disorder? Thanks

4:03 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home